Difference between revisions of "V1.4 SP15.0"
From FPDS-NG
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==SPR Listing== | ==SPR Listing== | ||
<TABLE id="box-table-a" border=2 style="width: 990px"> | <TABLE id="box-table-a" border=2 style="width: 990px"> | ||
| − | <th width=18% align="center"><b>SPR #</b></th><th width=30% align="center"><b>Enhancement/Problem | + | <th width=18% align="center"><b>SPR #</b></th><th width=30% align="center"><b>Enhancement/Problem</b></th><th width=38% align="center"><b>Solution</b></th><th width=25% align="center"><b>Impact to Users and Integrators</b></th> |
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="width:95px" valign="top">FPDSPMOS-117</td> | <td style="width:95px" valign="top">FPDSPMOS-117</td> | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<td>FPDS-NG is accepting PSC values in mixed case through Business Services and saving them in mixed case. For Example s119. This is causing the Atom feed to have a blank description for the PSC. | <td>FPDS-NG is accepting PSC values in mixed case through Business Services and saving them in mixed case. For Example s119. This is causing the Atom feed to have a blank description for the PSC. | ||
<td>In-Progress | <td>In-Progress | ||
| − | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center">No</td> | <td align="center">No</td> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-59064</td> | <td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-59064</td> | ||
<td>New rule that will not allow Place of Performance to be the United States if the vendor DUNS is one of the following: | <td>New rule that will not allow Place of Performance to be the United States if the vendor DUNS is one of the following: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
13-666-6505 Spouses of Service Personnel | 13-666-6505 Spouses of Service Personnel | ||
| Line 58: | Line 57: | ||
15-390-6193 Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting" | 15-390-6193 Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting" | ||
<td>In-Progress | <td>In-Progress | ||
| − | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center">No</td> | <td align="center">No</td> | ||
| + | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-92843</td> | <td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-92843</td> | ||
<td>Multi-Year Contract propagation on BPA Call | <td>Multi-Year Contract propagation on BPA Call | ||
| − | |||
"Multi-year contract" Use case for V1.4 BPA and BPA Call is 'Not Required'. When a V1.4 call is placed against a V1.4 BPA, application is working fine. | "Multi-year contract" Use case for V1.4 BPA and BPA Call is 'Not Required'. When a V1.4 call is placed against a V1.4 BPA, application is working fine. | ||
| Line 116: | Line 114: | ||
<td>In-Progress | <td>In-Progress | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | <td align="center">No</td> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td style="width:95px" valign="center">USASP-9</td> | ||
| + | <td> | ||
| + | Change the USA Spending - IT Dashboard API implementation to improve the match rate | ||
| + | |||
| + | IT Dashboard uses the USA Spending API to match IT Contracts. Due to incorrect/incomplete data sent from IT dashboard in the API requests, most of the contracts cannot be matched. | ||
| + | <td>In-Progress | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | <td align="center">No</td> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td style="width:95px" valign="center">USASP-10</td> | ||
| + | <td> | ||
| + | Add drilldown capability for Competition Pie Chart in Summaries section of the USA Spending website. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Currently in Summaries for Contracts Data, the competition information is shown in the following three categories: | ||
| + | |||
| + | a. Competition Not Reported <br> | ||
| + | b. Not Competed Dollars <br> | ||
| + | c. Competed Dollars | ||
| + | |||
| + | The functionality for drilling down further needs to be added. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <td>In-Progress | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td align="center">No</td> | <td align="center">No</td> | ||
Revision as of 16:24, 7 June 2012
Schedule
| Description | Start Date | End Date |
|---|---|---|
| BETA Installation | Monday June 18, 2012 | Monday June 18, 2012 |
| Functional Qualification Testing | Tuesday June 19, 2012 | Thursday June 21, 2012 |
| Installation in Production | Friday June 29, 2012 | Friday June 29, 2012 |
Document Changes
| Documentation | Changes Required |
|---|---|
| XML Specifications | No |
| Web Services | No |
| Data Dictionary | No |
| NASA Specific Data Dictionary | No |
| Use Case Summary | No |
| Validation Rules | Yes |
| Reporting | Yes |
| Online Help | Yes |
| Computer-Based Training | No |
| User Manual | No |
SPR Listing
| SPR # | Enhancement/Problem | Solution | Impact to Users and Integrators |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPDSPMOS-117 | Add 'Micro-Purchase Threshold' to the following rules
If "Solicitation Procedures" is 'Simplified Acquisition' and "Other than Full and Open Competition" is 'SAP Non-Competition', 'Authorized Resale' or 'Authorized By Statute', then "Extent Competed" must be 'Not Competed Under SAP' - 10M07A If "Other than Full and Open Competition" is 'SAP Non-Competition', then "Solicitation Procedures" must be 'Simplified Acquisition'. - 10M09 |
In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-103318 | FPDS-NG is accepting PSC values in mixed case through Business Services and saving them in mixed case. For Example s119. This is causing the Atom feed to have a blank description for the PSC. | In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-59064 | New rule that will not allow Place of Performance to be the United States if the vendor DUNS is one of the following:
13-666-6505 Spouses of Service Personnel 16-744-6249 Navy Vessel Purchases In Foreign Ports 15-390-6193 Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting" | In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-92843 | Multi-Year Contract propagation on BPA Call
"Multi-year contract" Use case for V1.4 BPA and BPA Call is 'Not Required'. When a V1.4 call is placed against a V1.4 BPA, application is working fine. But, when a V1.4 call is placed against an older version BPA(1.2 or lower), the value is getting propagated to the Call. | In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-86870/99911 | CO Business size is not propagating correctly from the IDV Novation to the Delivery Orders if the DO base references the IDV base and the some mods reference the Novation
If a 'Novation' mod is performed and then another mod is performed after the 'Novation' mod, the new mod propagates the vendor information from the 'Novation' mod as expected. However when the 'Novation' mod is deleted, vendor information is not brought forward from the base. | In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-99320 | 10C21 is firing for Part 13 BPA Call incorrectly by reading the “Other than Full and Open Competition” value on the BPA.
10C21 - If the "Base and all options Value" is greater than $3000, and if the “Contingency Humanitarian Peace Keeping Operation" is “Not applicable' then "Other than full and open competition" cannot be ' Less than or equal to the Micro Purchase threshold". It is supposed to read the value from the Part 13 call as the use case is ‘Optional’. | In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-102598/102686/103065/103033 | Funding office name is incorrect on Contract screens(correct in reports)
Offices OA (Office of Administration) and OAM (Office of Air and Marine) under 7014. When user picks the shorter code on contracts (OA), name corresponding to the longer code is getting displayed (Office of Air and Marine) | In-Progress | No |
| FPDSHD-87276 | Vendor Congressional district fix. Congressional district in reports should be derived based on the zip code only when the Country code is US. | Since “Congressional District” does not apply to foreign vendors, Standard and Adhoc reporting, and Atom Feeds shall not display a value for “Vendor Congressional District”. | No |
| FPDSPMOS-113 | Add D&B disclaimer to FPDS-NG | In-Progress | No |
| USASP-9 |
Change the USA Spending - IT Dashboard API implementation to improve the match rate IT Dashboard uses the USA Spending API to match IT Contracts. Due to incorrect/incomplete data sent from IT dashboard in the API requests, most of the contracts cannot be matched. | In-Progress | No |
| USASP-10 |
Add drilldown capability for Competition Pie Chart in Summaries section of the USA Spending website. Currently in Summaries for Contracts Data, the competition information is shown in the following three categories: a. Competition Not Reported The functionality for drilling down further needs to be added. | In-Progress | No |